Could Anyone Have Prevented It? Airports, Airlines, and Aircraft Manufacturers the Law May Look At
If you are asking whether someone could have prevented the accident, three groups usually come into view.
The airport is often the first question. Airports certificated under the FAA's airport certification rules operate under requirements that include wildlife hazard assessments and wildlife hazard management plans where they apply. For an injured passenger or family, that means the law may ask whether a required assessment or plan existed at the airport where the strike happened, and whether it was followed.
Air carriers and charter operators come next. A charter (Part 135) operator is a company that flies passengers or cargo for hire on demand rather than on an airline schedule. Both airlines and charter operators carry obligations about crew training and keeping aircraft airworthy, and their training, dispatch and maintenance decisions may be examined. Our related page on the skydiving plane crashes topic shows how operator type changes the picture in another setting.
The companies that built the aircraft are the third group. If you are wondering whether the engine or airframe should have withstood the strike, the relevant standards are federal: engines are type-certificated under the FAA's airworthiness standards for aircraft engines, which address bird ingestion, and airframes for transport-category airplanes fall under the FAA's transport-category airworthiness standards.
None of this makes anyone liable just because a strike happened. Negligence, the legal term for failing to use reasonable care, asks four things: whether a duty existed, whether it was breached, whether that breach caused the accident, and whether damages resulted. Whether each element is met depends on the facts of the specific accident.
Product liability is a separate theory. It asks whether an engine or airframe component had a design or manufacturing defect that caused the harm, and it is distinct from negligence. Federal regulations set safety standards, but state tort law governs most civil claims, and fault rules and damages rules differ from state to state. For someone weighing a claim, this means which parties are examined, and under which state's rules, shapes what losses may be recoverable.